Chronic Illness and Academic Accommodation
Full Title
Author(s)
Centering Voices
Year of Publication
Media Type
Media Access
The article is freely available in a digitally accessible, downloadable format from the Social Work Commons, the Disability and Equity in Education Commons, and the Higher Education Commons.
Reading Rooms
Usefulness to Educators
Jung is able to draw out and problematize how academic accommodations fall short of delivering equitable learning experiences. This is one of the very few academic papers that looks at the experiences of learners with chronic illness in post-secondary. She outlines how requiring an individual to be medically vetted can be an insurmountable hurdle for some learners, and how specific institutional, individualized practices disable learners.
Premise
Using an institutional ethnography methodology Jung is able to trace how academic accommodation policies and practices work to protect the institution from legal action and from the costs and paradigm-shifting work of fully redressing inaccessible learning environments and learning experiences. She argues that accommodations processes preserve the existing social organization of the university, looking carefully at where the Academy holds firm to policies “in the interests of students with disabilities” when perhaps challenging and improving those policies would better serve “the interests of students with disabilities.”
Purpose
This paper investigates how policies that provide academic accommodation for students disabled by chronic illness unfold in practice and draws attention to the power dynamics at play.
Research Methods
- Institutional Ethnography
- Discourse Analysis
Conceptual or Theoretical Frameworks
- Social model of disability
- Critical feminist perspective
- Challenges neo-liberal individualization
Reference with Published Abstract (when available)
Abstract: People with disabilities are just one of the groups designated for special attention in relation to equity in postsecondary education. This paper explores the way in which policies that provide academic accommodation for students disabled by chronic illness unfold in practice. As part of the administrative regime of the university, these policies are typically designed to reconcile the interests and relevances of the law with the interests and relevances of the academy. When a disabled student “activates” the policy, regardless of whether or not services and assistance are provided or are useful, the student becomes situated within social relations that make disabled students’ “needs” manageable in the organizational context. As applicants for the institution’s privileges and services, students actively participate in the accomplishment of the institutional order of the university, i.e., they fulfil the university’s legal obligation not to discriminate against students with disabilities. This, I will argue, constitutes an exercise of power and preserves the existing social organization of the university, although it is normally understood as the university acting “in the interests of students with disabilities.” Specifically, I show how the individualization of accommodation-ostensibly to meet each student’s unique needs-shifts the obligation for change to individual students and instructors and forecloses opportunities for the university to become more genuinely accessible and inclusive.
Points of Connection
“…the individualization of accommodation-ostensibly to meet each student’s unique needs-shifts the obligation for change to individual students and instructors and fore-closes opportunities for the university to become more genuinely accessible and inclusive.”
“At academic institutions across Canada [“educational equity” (Fortin, 1987)] has entailed the creation of a social “disabilities apparatus” organized around the concepts of accessibility and accommodation. In postsecondary education, accessibility refers to the institution’s legal obligation to create genuine opportunities for people with disabilities to participate in all aspects of university life. The duty to accommodate, as one aspect of the duty not to discriminate, requires the institution to take an active part in modifying those practices, facilities, or services that prevent the inclusion and participation of otherwise qualified students who are disabled (BCEADS, 1996).”
Points of Contention
Findings
Coming Soon.
Leave a Reply