Unhiding Ableism in Education
Conscious and unconscious ableism in technology-integrated learning presents in many ways. It can show up in our digital practices – our digital skills, choices and actions. It can be found in course design, assessment design, as well as our curation and communication workflows. It can also influence technology-integrated learning research design and research dissemination.
The antidote to ableism is critical questioning of our taken-for-granted practices.

The Academy has become a disabling workplace for many educators and learners.
The pace at which technology changes is dizzying. Many feel unstable and unsupported to keep up.
Rather than supporting the learning community to develop more accessible digital praxis and more critical and liberatory relationships with learning technology, the Academy tends to uncritically valourize faculty and learners who work at the bleeding edge.
But who isn’t able to work there? For whom is it even meaningful to work there? And what does continuously pushing people to the bleeding edge do to a community?
Faculty burnout and academic integrity are the most pressing teaching and learning challenges at post-secondary institutions across Canada.”
Johnson, N. (2023). An Increasing Demand for Technology Use in Teaching and Learning: 2023 Pan-Canadian Report on Digital Learning Trends in Canadian Post-Secondary Education. Canadian Digital Learning Research Association.
Even and especially in this context, critical questions are tools for change.
Does educator workload trump accessible teaching and learning practices?
Very often, yes. So what do we do with that?